Skip to main content

SQL Server 2012 RTM–Are you waiting for SP1?

As you probably know by now SQL Server 2012 was launched last week, Microsoft had an online launch event that was pretty spectacular but  has also drawn some criticism following the event because the online platform initially struggled to cope with the load of 45,000 plus users. You can view the keynote and some of the sessions on the SQL Server launch website   We also had a release to manufacturing (RTM) this week. SQL Server 2012 is available to download on MSDN and has been available on there since the 7th March. SQL Server 2012 is on general release from the 1st April.

If you follow the SQL Server community on twitter, you will no doubt have seen a fair number number of SQL Server professional have downloaded and installed SQL Server 2012 RTM in their ‘sandpit’ or ‘test’ type environments. I have seen a few tweets over the weekend that suggest people have downloaded and installed the new version in their own time, probably on their own test kit. These are the people who are investing in their future and trying to keep ahead of the curve. Not everyone is a surfer though and not everyone likes to be in front of the wave, and not everyone, companies in particular,  like to be on the bleeding edge.

Many of my clients like their SQL Server platform to be stable, SQL Server 2005, SQL Server 2008 and SQ Server 2008 R2 are pretty stable and as such many of my clients have shown no interest in upgrading to SQL Server 2012 any time soon, they may plan to upgrade  in twelve to eighteen  months time but for now they are staying put. Some organisations might prefer to wait for perhaps the first service pack before they would consider upgrading their production systems to the new version, they are of the opinion that any early bugs or major bugs will be fixed with the Service Pack. They have a perception that the product will be more stable by the time the product has a service pack. I have other clients  who want to use the new AlwaysOn features as soon as possible and are currently the process of planning to upgrade.

I have also seen a few people on twitter  asking questions about possible bugs in the RTM release. Don’t look so shocked, we work in the software industry and all software has ‘bugs’ and it should not be a shock that SQL Server has some too. It was these bugs though, that got me thinking and asking some questions, I think it these bugs or perceived these bugs that put off some organisations from upgrading when the RTM version becomes available. So these are my questions…

  • Do people have solid plans in place to upgrade to SQL Server 2012?
  • If so what is the time scale?

I know organisations planning on doing this in the next few months and I have others who have a ‘policy’ that states they will be waiting until the first service pack before they would consider upgrading. I guess I’m just trying to get a feel for how many people are looking to put SQL Server 2012 in production now or later or more likely somewhere in between.

Please do leave a comment with your timescales or thoughts on this subject. I’d more than interested to hear your views

Comments

  1. No plans at SQLServerCentral right now. We have other work in progress and no time to test currently, but I suspect we will be like some of your clients. Somewhere in the 9-18month range we'll upgrade.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Steve, Thanks for taking the time to leave a comment. That does seem like the most popular time frame. Will SSC plan on using the new AlwaysOn features?

    ReplyDelete
  3. We always wait until the first Service Pack.

    As much as I want the new features, it is just not worth the risk...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Small business here, We are setting up our 2012 test environment now.

    ReplyDelete
  5. we are planning to use in production next week

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Always Encrypted

By David Postlethwaite

Always Encrypted is new features in SQL Server 2016 and it is also available in Azure SQL Database. Here you can encrypt columns in a table with a master key and a certificate so that they will appear as encrypted strings to those who don’t have the required certificate installed on their pc.
Once the certificate is installed on the computer then the unencrypted data can then be seen as normal.

The data passes from database to your application as the encrypted value, only the application with the correct certificate can unencrypt the data so it is secure across the wire. This will go some way to resolving the concern of people worried about putting their sensitive data on a shared server in the cloud such as Microsoft Azure and accessing the data across the Internet.

At the time of writing Always Encrypted is only supported with ADO.NET 4.6, JDBC 6.0 and ODBC 13.1 but expect other driver to become available.

The calling application (including SSMS) must also hav…

SQL Server 2012 and Virtual Service Accounts

This post is written by David Postlethwaite
If you are using SQL Server 2012 you will probably have noticed that the default account for the SQL services has changed from that used in previous versions. With SQL 2005 and 2008 the default account for SQL service and SQL Agent service was “NT Authority\System”. This is one the built in accounts on a Windows machine, managed by the machine and selectable from a dedicated dropdown list

The Network Service account was introduced in Windows 2003 as an alternative to using the LocalSystem account, which has full local system privileges on the local machine, a major security concern.
The Network Service has limited local privileges easing these security concerns but when many services on a machine use the Network Service account it becomes harder to track which service is actually accessing resources and performing actions, because all the services are using the one Network Service account.
Also, this account, by default, has sysadmin per…

SQL Server Express v SQL Server Developer Edition

SQL Server Express v  SQL Server Developer Edition
Over the weekend I received the following in an email from Ali Ahmad who asked me some questions about learning SQL Server. We exchanged a couple of emails so I have boiled this down to the most salient points.

Question:
Goal: I want to learn SQL Server inside out… for career progression as DBA/BI/data mining. I'm a data analyst and want to learn inside out about data warehousing.
•I understand relational database concepts...
•I have SQL Server 2014 express installed…
•I need to download the adventure works sample in order to play with it.
•So much knowledge on Microsoft website it's easy to get lost… where do I begin?

SQL Server Express v SQL Server Developer
This is interesting. If you want to learn SQL Server inside out including the Business Intelligence suite of applications I would suggest downloading the developer edition of SQL Server which since 2016 has been made available free of charge. Prior to that there was a f…